The COVID Gene Jab. Inconvenient Truths.
Update on current status through my lens
Last fall I thought that the wall of propaganda deployed by the public-private partnership of western governments, WHO, WEF and NGO to support the COVID gene therapy technology-based “vaccines” would soon fall. I thought that the burden of evidence that the products were neither safe nor effective was overwhelming, and that the “official” lies had become unsustainable. Silly me. What I overlooked and underestimated was the power of the globalized censorship-industrial complex to literally distort reality and/or substitute a false synthetic reality for truth in large numbers of minds. For further details on how this works, I recommend the insights and documentation provided by Mike Benz and colleagues (Foundation for Freedom Online) and in particular the recent Tucker Carlson/Mike Benz interview.
Rather than the usual DC tactic of finding a convenient fall guy and pinning blame for this whole COVID fiasco on a sacrificial lamb (Tony Fauci/NIAID and Peter Daszak/Eco Health Alliance, for example), what has been done is to seek to completely avoid accountability by deploying heavy handed censorship, PsyWar, and propaganda techniques on local civilian populations as a way of obscuring and confusing the truth of the widespread mismanagement. This mismanagement has resulted in enormous and widespread economic damage, a global epidemic of excess all-cause mortality and morbidity, and deep damage in public trust in governmental organizations and their integrity.
And as even those methods are proving incapable of preventing inconvenient “COVID vaccine” facts from spreading via alternative media, governments are now resorting to criminalizing the sharing of inconvenient truths.
Turn your attention to France right now. In the dead of night, a new law slipped through the General Assembly that would make it a crime to criticize mRNA shots. Critics call it the Pfizer law. It calls for fines of up to 45,000 euros and possibly three years in prison for debunking an approved medical treatment.
Similar legislation is currently pending in the Canadian province of British Columbia. Nothing says “safe and effective” quite like prison time and fines for publicly questioning whether a medical product is safe and effective.
Currently, there is a concerted global effort to not only prevent distribution of the actual facts concerning the damages done by the global public health response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but to quite literally criminalize those who seek to share those facts.
All this despite the CDC now considering COVID signs, symptoms and risks similar to those of other common respiratory viruses, and no longer recommending a five day isolation period for COVID.
What are those inconvenient facts which cannot be shared?
The modified mRNA and adenoviral vectored products are not “traditional” vaccines, employ cutting edge gene delivery or gene therapy technologies, and should be regulated as gene therapy products.
These “leaky” products did not prevent infection, replication, and spread of SARS-CoV-2, and indiscriminate mass administration of these products contributed to evolution of more antibody-resistant viral strains.
In contrast to official HHS communications, these products distribute throughout the body after injection, and are not localized to injection site and associated lymph nodes. This wide distribution contributes to product toxicity and risk, as the body responds by mounting inflammatory responses to both the genetic delivery particles themselves as well as the encoded proteins which these products cause the body to manufacture in the cells and tissues which receive these products.
The viral “spike” protein which these products cause patients’ bodies to manufacture is a genetically engineered toxin.
The lipid nanoparticle formulation used to deliver the modified mRNA has intrinsic toxicity in humans.
These products do not deliver natural messenger RNA, but rather a synthetic chemically modified form with extended stability which cause the body to produce “frameshifted” unnatural, unintended proteins.
These products are contaminated with previously undisclosed short DNA fragments which are co-delivered into tissues and cells of patients (together with the modified m-RNA), and which at an unknown and uncharacterized frequency damage patients’ genomes.
Analysis of public databases clearly demonstrate a causal relationship between administration the these products and a variety of toxicities including cardiac damages, central and peripheral nervous system damages, damage associated with abnormal blood clotting, and death.
Public health data from a wide variety of western government sources demonstrate that the repeated administration of these modified mRNA products are associated with “negative efficacy” (increased risk of COVID disease) beginning between one and three months after administration.
In parallel, at the fringes of the “medical freedom” movement, there are efforts to delegitimize those who have been reporting these inconvenient truths if they are not sufficiently strident in their statements. Infiltrators, those who believe that they have not received sufficient attention for their own theories, and chaos agents are sowing discord by claiming that others who have remained data and documentation-based in their criticism must be “controlled opposition”, “grifters”, compromised by conflicts of interest, or in some way surreptitiously acting on behalf of governments, pharma, NGO, WEF or WHO if they do not endorse the latest and most extreme theories. While much of this involves variants of well known internet Trolling strategies (for example concern trolling or sealioning), in other cases either spontaneous or promoted moral outbidding/purity spirals (which are related to virtue signaling) drive groups committed to defending medical freedom into endorsing unsupported theories.
In the latest twist on the promoted and weaponized controversy of Germ vs Terrain Theory, various groups are now promoting the logic that there was no pandemic, and there was no SARS-CoV-2 virus. This thesis is built on redefinition of the meaning of the term “pandemic” to require global distribution of a highly lethal virus (if not sufficiently lethal, then “no pandemic”, or so goes the logic), and a misinterpretation of the correct observation of the widespread misuse of insufficiently specific or contaminated PCR-based testing (often employing excessively high cycle numbers) as demonstrating that to this group that “all” SARS-CoV-2 viral sequence data is fraudulent.
Those promoting these theories are quite evangelistic in their belief, and consistent with the dynamics of moral outbidding and purity spirals attack and reject any who do not endorse their belief systems. Behaving akin to a cult, they typically reject data and alternative definitions or explanations inconsistent with their theories (as well as rejecting and ridiculing those who do not endorse their conclusions). In many cases, these armchair philosopher/epidemiologists find common cause with adjacent cults which deny the existence of all viruses.
One consequence is the further alienation and discouragement of moderate, fact and documentation-based discussions and opinions. Another is that any dissenting opinions which differ from officially approved narratives are more readily cast as biased and unsupported- a strategic guilt by association. And most importantly the movable middle of the current political spectrum is alienated by what is rightfully seen as unsupported extremism.
And as if that was not enough, as public interest in COVID wanes, those whose employment and careers have been damaged by speaking out about government, pharmaceutical industry and WHO mismanagement and untruths are now confronting new professional and economic realities. Medical licenses have been revoked, businesses have been destroyed, and employment opportunities have dried up. In many cases, these individuals have gained some degree of fame or notoriety from their dissenting opinions, and may have found ways to monetize this via telemedicine, selling on-line treatments, “praying away the COVID”, or promoting various social media-based business models. But as public interest has waned, often these individuals or groups have found it necessary to take increasingly strident positions (or to attack others) resulting in an endless spiral of hype and outrage in pursuit of fame and fortune. This is a fundamentally immature and narcissistic response to a foreseeable winding down of this particular weaponized fear/crisis pairing, which could be avoided by focusing on the underlying issues of systemic corruption, the long term consequences of over-reliance on public-private partnerships, globalism, the rise of the censorship-industrial complex itself, and the exploitation of fear to advance political objectives. All of this further alienates the “persuadable middle” of the political spectrum, who can be reached and persuaded by clearly and calmly speaking provable data-based truth and providing “common sense” arguments.
And it is with that spirit in mind that recent testimony by a range of domestic and non-US experts was provided at the request of Senator Ron Johnson, an eminently reasonable midwestern businessman (with expertise in manufacturing) who has chosen to remain in the US Senate for another term largely because of his commitment to getting to the bottom of the COVID lies. Some might say that Senator Johnson is naive in his belief that this will make a difference and empower a more informed electorate to influence future public health policies so that we might all avoid another round of similarly arbitrary and capricious mismanagement. I suspect that even the Senator would acknowledge that this may be a labor worthy of Sisyphus, but nevertheless he keeps trying against all odds.
And so long as he is willing to try, I will be proud to serve my country in support of his efforts if again requested to do so. Damn the trolls, full speed ahead.
The video montage inserted below was prepared by the Senator’s staff as a summary of the many hours of provided testimony.
See Video over on Substack
If you would like these blog posts to appear in your email stream,
please sign up to